There is no experiencer but there are experiencings - that's not quite rightly said, the experiencer is a script, a character defined by a script, a Cartesian script you might say in that case, and in this respect is nothing unusual, the 'mind' being all scripts playing out in various ways according to various assumptions, various kinds of metaphysics. Every kind of identification is possible as long as it fails somewhere, gets entangled and lost, or suddenly emerges emptied out. Just as there needs to be a stage and a director and an audience, all are scripts but not entirely compatible with each other. What is interesting is not the action but whatever it is that makes such actions possible, the sheer unmotivated granting of it!