Blog Archive
-
▼
2022
(365)
-
▼
October
(31)
- A private language does different things than a p...
- Experience of self occurs in a private language a...
- Experience as that which seeks to be expressed an...
- If there is a capacity for experience to connect ...
- The imperative to understand everything, meaning ...
- The interplay of the operators 'for all' and 'the...
- The experiencing that is you is in relation to al...
- The self in the street, you might think of it as ...
- The material reality with its endless unfolding d...
- The cogito is less about thinking reaching into b...
- The appearing and experiencing world with its iro...
- Is it no more than a thought experiment to concei...
- When you think of reality, of all that matters, y...
- The great historical cycle is driven by the striv...
- It's not a background consciousness but a backgro...
- The distinction between whatness and thatness con...
- Is the background of being, the underlying of the...
- The idealist notion of the absolute subject behin...
- Interweaving and overlapping of kinds of activity...
- Subject and object can be regarded as independent...
- Instead of subject and object, think of seller an...
- There is no experiencer but there are experiencin...
- The character or egoity is what brings experience...
- You experiencing as human experiencing is grounde...
- All of those human aspirations for eminence or do...
- Aspiring to being is having a face, or perhaps be...
- In the world of appearances the stakes always see...
- The cascade of inner objects, immediately identif...
- Facticity is in the gap between what what life ha...
- Every framing in terms of consciousness or experi...
- To be quiet enough to sense the dominant mood, th...
-
▼
October
(31)
Saturday, 15 October 2022
Is the background of being, the underlying of the underlying reality such as to bring forth the aggregate of beings, a comprehensive unity of what is disclosed to any kind of presence, a mystical body of being, so to speak, or is that a fanciful notion born of the metaphysical projection of 'conditions of possibility'? Such an aggregate reality would embrace not only the so-called physical cosmos but also the totality of experiencings, every right understanding and every illusion and all the multilevel interactions between the two and in such a way that everything in being would be in its rightful place, belonging to its archetype. Or is it perhaps more truly radical that no such aggregate can prevail, or may there be many different ones incompatible and undecidable on any account? Or would the very notion come apart in living proximity to the source?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.