Blog Archive

Saturday, 15 October 2022

Is the background of being, the underlying of the underlying reality such as to bring forth the aggregate of beings, a comprehensive unity of what is disclosed to any kind of presence, a mystical body of being, so to speak, or is that a fanciful notion born of the metaphysical projection of 'conditions of possibility'? Such an aggregate reality would embrace not only the so-called physical cosmos but also the totality of experiencings, every right understanding and every illusion and all the multilevel interactions between the two and in such a way that everything in being would be in its rightful place, belonging to its archetype. Or is it perhaps more truly radical that no such aggregate can prevail, or may there be many different ones incompatible and undecidable on any account? Or would the very notion come apart in living proximity to the source?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.