Blog Archive
-
▼
2020
(366)
-
▼
December
(31)
- The natural attitude is also called animal faith,...
- The only thing you can do or not do is to take th...
- It's not a matter of finding out the solution to ...
- Seeing is like nothing else but seeing. It's not ...
- Not much has changed, you were seeing it clear ju...
- The distinction between happening as arising in t...
- Self, the 'I', or will, or affect, or whatever it...
- The being of consciousness, of the knowing 'I', i...
- Rather than you experiencing, experiencing is you...
- Is it real or is it only in the mind? Or put anot...
- It's not about dissolving the belief in a separat...
- The notional split of experiencing into subject (...
- Dreams are mostly a rapid succession of undevelop...
- Will is inherently dualist or better pluralist. Y...
- There is no knowing without an element of will, a...
- C. S. Peirce: "Experience is the course of life. ...
- In mood there is temporalisation as the proto-n...
- It is as if there is a tuning dial that can be jo...
- As in most instances you only have one idea, have...
- Ideal intentions are in ideal time which is no t...
- In studying a picture you can switch your percept...
- Through the cycling days you play your assigned r...
- The subject as feeling, this resumes both the sub...
- To have both phenomenology and structure at the s...
- What if a paradigm for mind were the emergence of...
- Without preconceptions apply the mind to the mind...
- The subject as witness is the notion that experie...
- Consciousness is likened to witnessing to the mak...
- If the unconscious had bought into the idea that ...
- Ideas of the origin of the self, or the ego, in m...
- There cannot be objective reality without a prior...
-
▼
December
(31)
Monday, 7 December 2020
What if a paradigm for mind were the emergence of a hive mind in an ant colony? In this there are two layers, the rudimentary mental world of the individual ant, an unfocused contingent will driven by incomprehensible urges and the collective mind evolved to respond purposefully to a range of effective conditions or pragmatic realities on an entirely different level. These two layers of mind are each generalised responders to to immediate conditions and hence proto-conscious but their worlds are not and cannot be in direct communication, even though indirect communication is essential to them. It is the nature of this indirect communication, both the top-down and the bottom-up that is interesting, representing a kind of noumenality or action of the unconscious. The individual seeks to fulfill its wayward desire without understanding the logic of its motives. For the hive the individual is both essential and indiscernible, without identity, its 'I' merely instrumental.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.