Blog Archive
-
▼
2020
(366)
-
▼
August
(31)
- The naturalist version of the being of things...
- The distinction of mind, or consciousness in ...
- Consciousness as something like a faculty, a...
- Naively viewed, consciousness is a flimsy thi...
- What is called consciousness is just the idea...
- There is a life story too, but it is viewed m...
- That tiny interval in awareness that separate...
- That consciousness unfolds according to categ...
- Will's knowledge is outside or discursive con...
- If you set up a duality like will and represe...
- The opposition of desire and consciousness is...
- While there remains a question about the evol...
- Every designation or deixis (pointing) of 'th...
- Past events remain open and incomplete, not i...
- Breaking representation also breaks the categ...
- The split in the world is not between I-it and ...
- One indicator that you are touching the backg...
- Most of the time it's only an odd conceit of ...
- Everyday experience is endless ways of evadin...
- Almost every individual moment of experiencin...
- Whatever discoveries you make in the course o...
- The origin, or what elicits a thought is outs...
- Discursive mind is like a workshop cluttered ...
- Self inquires, it reflects, is aware, is cons...
- It is not as if the 'I' is an object-symbol (...
- Before it was a self that you were it was a sou...
- There are many physical and chemical phenomen...
- There are clever theories which go a way towa...
- If you were to build a sentient robot capable o...
- It all comes down to not putting the cart be...
- You can't think of being or attend to it beca...
-
▼
August
(31)
Wednesday, 5 August 2020
There are many physical and chemical phenomena which, like elective affinities or dissipative chaotic systems, seem to be proto-volitional, so as to suggest that given a physicalist theory of mind it would not be too hard to ensure that desire was also explained via fundamental forces. This is quite wrong because when such phenomena and their characteristic forces are incorporated into a physicalist theory they only act according to cause and effect rules, the thing about them that looks like intentionality is precisely what can't be part of the explanation. Desire leads to an explanatory gap as surely as qualia. In fact it is much easier to see physical forces as primitive forms of desire than the other way around. This is pretty much the 'intrinsic nature' idea of consciousness, or equivalently Schopenhauer's Will.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.