If the sole underlying reality is that in which or for which you appear then it is the same in respect of your ceasing to appear. Your life and your death and everything in between merely appearances or arisals in this sole condition for any sort of experienced reality. It is then a kind of pure distinction, and abstract power of choice or distinction. If you were to be reborn as another with no memory of your former life there would still be a sense in which it was you, different shadows playing on the same screen? But then why could this not be what is already in place in relation to every other person or sentience, the very same screen? You have pushed the background of consciousness so far back that it embraces every degree of difference. Yourself yesterday and yourself today and tomorrow appearing on the same timeless screen despite there being mo real commerce between them. This is absurd, but since it is the inevitable conclusion of your questions ought you to embrace this absurdity or reject the whole logic and start over again?
Blog Archive
-
▼
2020
(366)
-
▼
May
(31)
- What practical difference is there between a ...
- All computational theories of mind including ...
- The simulation hypothesis utilises the idea t...
- The narratives within experience are of more ...
- Experience as your experience is always based...
- The flux of experience is intentional all the...
- The constancies of outer perception provide r...
- Inhaling is action, it is what you do, while ...
- If the sole underlying reality is that in whi...
- The 'I' that witnesses being is beyond being ...
- In the cogito as mostly understood, being is ...
- All of the senses are at the surfaces of the ...
- A practice consists of a performance in a situ...
- The subject subjected is less than a shadow s...
- Be it as it may, it is only significant in it...
- If there is a moment of experience prior to r...
- To be cognisant of an event is to have that e...
- According to folk metaphysics you are a compl...
- Everyday schizophrenia, that you are an entir...
- That subjectivation is an inevitable and ines...
- Everything, that is every thing, subjectivise...
- Every worthwhile question has no answer withi...
- Every content can be chased down to its initi...
- Your thought is of the thinkable, but the thi...
- It doesn't make a difference whether the obje...
- In everyday waking awareness you strongly pro...
- Experiencing is structured discursively. It i...
- Unfocused anxiety is is like insomnia, as if...
- There is a Zeno-like paradox to Phenomenon, t...
- Thought solves problems, makes plans, reconsi...
- If idealism were true, then it wouldn't be id...
-
▼
May
(31)
Saturday, 23 May 2020
If the sole underlying reality is that in which or for which you appear then it is the same in respect of your ceasing to appear. Your life and your death and everything in between merely appearances or arisals in this sole condition for any sort of experienced reality. It is then a kind of pure distinction, and abstract power of choice or distinction. If you were to be reborn as another with no memory of your former life there would still be a sense in which it was you, different shadows playing on the same screen? But then why could this not be what is already in place in relation to every other person or sentience, the very same screen? You have pushed the background of consciousness so far back that it embraces every degree of difference. Yourself yesterday and yourself today and tomorrow appearing on the same timeless screen despite there being mo real commerce between them. This is absurd, but since it is the inevitable conclusion of your questions ought you to embrace this absurdity or reject the whole logic and start over again?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.