Blog Archive
-
▼
2017
(348)
-
▼
December
(31)
- Not just a subject but a human being. Is thi...
- It's not that complicated, really. Many phi...
- Why should self-inquiry be modeled on impers...
- Every attempt to reason about politics fail...
- The political, which is neither wholly real ...
- And if you barely understand the mind still ...
- The more impersonal, the more abstract and ...
- t If there is no interpretation of interpreta...
- Everything said of intentionality is true o...
- As if things are somehow there behind a veil...
- The term consciousness does not refer to a ...
- In awakening there is the certainty that thi...
- One idea on seeing how the questions that a...
- It isn't a story, the aerial view is the onl...
- How to maintain the dog? It was an old face ...
- A nest builds a nest in chaos, it stays emp...
- This never gets written about, it has no lyr...
- Shadows of trees, gentle featherings of ligh...
- De gustibus... Modern relativism when not t...
- All the splendid negations and negations of ...
- Repeat any act and it falls away, decays int...
- The frail shoulders of present consciousnes...
- Everything is saturated with meanings and ye...
- The mechanism of repression, or more broadly...
- Like intention and purpose desire is another...
- You have died into your identity, your loves...
- Each time starting out again, trying to to g...
- Disavowal goes deeper than, say the apost...
- At any one time there is a particular set...
- It's not going too far to imagine a tribal c...
- To gain some idea of the degree to which ...
-
▼
December
(31)
Wednesday, 20 December 2017
In awakening there is the certainty that this potentiality exists unattenuated in 'every sentient being'. How is this possible unless the awakening is integral to sentience as such, is in no way related to the content or condition of such sentience? To the extent that this simple equivalence seems impossible, you are surely mistaking some sort of projected splendour for the essence, looking outward to experience or to assumptions about the objective existence of others. That there is some sort of error in understanding, a confusion of categories, may be true without the consequence that the cause of this is a kind of stupidity, a substantial and negative attribute of beings, a kind of agency or inveteracy. The error is no one's error since it is the attributing of existence and agency to the error itself. But faced with this intuition you still find yourself wanting to do something about it, to find some good use for all your pent-up cleverness.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.