Blog Archive
-
▼
2015
(207)
-
▼
July
(31)
- No matter what he tried there remained a str...
- The processes of understanding that he emplo...
- It is all very well to recollect in tranquil...
- So much can be subsumed under attempts at ri...
- What was it he found himself doing? Inviting...
- Without a tincture of discontent the slides ...
- Heaps of things do not embody the idea of th...
- Where matter appears most dense there is the...
- His favourite scenes were of shadows, clouds...
- Amused detachment always seemed to him to be...
- The narrative of a dream produces a swift ti...
- The basic relation of nodes in tension is th...
- The dimension of time, of time experienced a...
- He considered his life, as primarily life an...
- He realised that if what he was looking...
- The distinction between self and other-self ...
- Subject and object as poles in experie...
- Certain encounters filled with delicacy and ...
- The event could suddenly take on the charact...
- He was unable to tell whether he more resemb...
- He'd started to observe that more and more e...
- For some of the time he experienced being i...
- In the latency after physical stress as expe...
- A focalisation and a project and a readiness...
- The enacting will requires not so much a res...
- His nostalgie de la boue. How delightful he ...
- The queasy familiarity of the hobble tailore...
- It is hard to pin down in the way it goes on...
- If there are things that are purely personal...
- The lyrical voice in popular songs is pervade...
- High up and to the side, a tiny cupboard tha...
-
▼
July
(31)
Thursday, 23 July 2015
His favourite scenes were of shadows, clouds, heaps, reflections, flat compositions, angular, unbalanced and obstructed views. Compositions were fields of items in tension, and the way these functioned to anchor relations of acknowledgement was something he thought he already understood. Clouds belonged in the family of saliencies which was akin to this. Shadows and reflections were different and obstructions different again. The former were a matter of the layering of one space over another, the ambiguity and mixing of separate fields, of which one was generally three-dimensional and the the other flat. This contained an allusion to the illusory qualities of depth perception. Obstructions also had a demystificatory dimension - the sudden frustration of the entitlement to transparency and depth, the something-in-the-way that blocks the spontaneity of the viewer and causes them to become aware of their seeing, the invisible functioning that embraces their entire world. This is why obstruction is best when it is blank and blind, a piece of pure texture.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.