Every experiencing is rooted in a mode of being. This is what becomes apparent from all the ways that it can be perturbed and only in relation to real or imagined challenges. When thought takes these over it speaks about being and bends it as a conception towards a prior understanding which, tailored to thinking is constrained and misleading. Whatever is intimated by these gaps within experience should lead thought out of itself and to what was never before recognised instead of the other way around. That is why the idea of an enduring self etc. should be dissolved rather than through some logical argument which effectively does only the opposite. Aside from this opening, closer in spirit to poetry than philosophy, ontology simply does not matter.