An opposition can be resolved, or rather dissolved by a change in the ground upon which it was based. I this case there is a loss of any narrative continuity, the shift cannot be described, everything about the former situation is cancelled as if it were a dream, only some vague recollection of the earlier context remains. This naturally escapes dialectics or any other kind of schematism. The intimation that this is always a possibility is only based on the understanding that no state of experiencing possesses its own ground. What serves as ground was always posited in some other time.