Blog Archive
-
▼
2021
(365)
-
▼
November
(30)
- The shame at existing is creatively misread as sh...
- Have there been cultures free from a pervasive sh...
- Experiencings arise as relative to certain struct...
- Experiencing knowingly experiencing - it's not ju...
- Functioning as a more or less independent and aut...
- A kind of shame at existing, sometimes visible ab...
- Consciousness is not identical with waking consci...
- Turning towards matter, its mystery, how to appro...
- The problem not that mind is losing its sovereign...
- If you inquire into what kind of thing this think...
- You can gain an intuitive but indirect awareness ...
- You have an innate and absolute conviction of you...
- However far you go in idealism, or non-duality, t...
- Experience is understood as experiencing, is alwa...
- Experience as a stream of positive contents, body...
- The worlds of knowing are endless mazes which tur...
- You are not the experiencing but the experienced....
- You always know what you are doing, but you don't...
- Under idealism the individual thing or event of t...
- You might think in words but your thoughts are no...
- The mind is in love with the body and the soul is...
- The now is perfectly real, that's obvious. A litt...
- The now is an ever fizzing source, bit is time it...
- Personal identity over time is never directly obs...
- For something to be it must be preceded by its co...
- Inner experience is registered in the stream of t...
- If there is an other nature that undergirds consc...
- In any computationalist or materialist, or more g...
- You only have a world because experience is tempo...
- There are so many different lines of investigatio...
-
▼
November
(30)
Saturday, 6 November 2021
For something to be it must be preceded by its condition for being. This principle might be another way of summarising idealism. One way to think of it is as metaphysics: every being is a limitation of the infinity of Being; the limitation is a series of distinctions and choices of distinctions which carve up the unlimited. The space of all possible distinctions precedes being. Another way is epistemological: what makes a certain kind of event an event of knowing (something) is a context or frame of possible knowing. There is a circularity in these notions. How is it possible for experiencing to not be any kind of knowing that would be subject to this kind of circularity?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.