Blog Archive
-
▼
2021
(365)
-
▼
September
(30)
- There are the questions, or the one question that...
- A represents B, if this substitution were the tem...
- These atoms or kernels of stories, or situational...
- Like all good dualist theories, samkhaya or 'the ...
- It's all made out of stories, like a vast mosaic ...
- Structure of the ego: it isn't an internalised pe...
- The soul is the only organ of awareness that you ...
- Attention to experiencing includes an implicit id...
- This has largely been an exercise in monitored de...
- Turning from what is being experienced to the ex...
- In memories there is a sense of something you oug...
- Another duality: in or before the scene and behin...
- Idealism is nominalist since for it appearance is...
- You are trying to peck your way out of an egg. Ho...
- You want to know what consciousness is, but the t...
- The two levels of idealism, critical and absolute...
- Idealism ought to be able to be decomposed into i...
- In experiencing there is a division into the act,...
- Is there anything that crosses the representation...
- What you ordinarily experience as experiencing ta...
- The indelible reality at the level of soul is oth...
- To say that consciousness is all there is is to s...
- Soul, or mental body, which has, by analogy, its ...
- Memory is a function of soul, not the other wat a...
- The idea of the soul is like that of the body. An...
- Primacy of experiencing (as the frame through whi...
- A generative theory of consciousness which was ab...
- What is past is non existent, like death as an ab...
- You can only know consciousness or experiencing i...
- Consciousness as an immediate awareness of what i...
-
▼
September
(30)
Thursday, 2 September 2021
You can only know consciousness or experiencing if you what is is different to, out of what background it has come to be. What is the not or absence of experiencing? If you think of death as you imagine it to be the absolute nothing, absence of all experiencing as, say, under a general anaesthetic - although that is only an idea arising in consciousness. This is so overdetermined by conscious constructs as to be entirely misleading. Whatever it is that is the not of consciousness is as present an all-pervading as consciousness, and is precisely not the background in any sense, because it is not prefigured in any way. Consciousness is the making-unsurprising of not-consciousness, and so not-consciousness is the utter surprising of consciousness!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.