The question of self or no-self only arises in temporality, it is about an enduring self versus instantaneous partial self-like phenomena or strategic virtual centres or something of that sort. If the source of experience is intemporal, or noumenal, then whether this could be called a self or not is irrelevant; dualistic logic does not apply. So, all that remains of self versus no-self is the relation of these temporally bound centred arisals to the noumenon or source of being. In this case it is clear that taken in themselves no such thing as continuity is possible since they are merely phenomena, but taken in relation to their source they as it were emanate (or not) from the 'same' point as each and every other phenomenon.