Blog Archive
-
▼
2019
(354)
-
▼
November
(30)
- Thought is to be understood more generally th...
- There is a Darwinian version of critical real...
- The more perfectly that art is able to render...
- Propositional attitudes or purposive actions ...
- If you were to describe your experience in co...
- If experience has certain features or content...
- Mind is imagined to be a complex mental organis...
- Consciousness is not in space or time, this is ...
- The other is alter-ego is the most radical an...
- Sometimes the city just beats you down and yo...
- If in writing some sort of structure of refer...
- Slow experiencing without reflection. At first...
- If the idea was to report in the lightest and...
- There is a fundamental anxiety against which a...
- 'Many are called, but few are chosen' - is th...
- But to realise existentially what you know ca...
- If you do a quick sweep of how you are spatial...
- Realism in no way resembles the colourless fa...
- The inherent uncertainty of experience is not t...
- Say that minds were nodal points in one overa...
- Kant's phrase "transscendentale Einheit der App...
- Wittgenstein's no private language argument an...
- You conduct an enquiry in thought. This means ...
- Step into a large and empty and very dimly-li...
- The three gunas form a sort of treadmill. The...
- What you are is being engaged in a situation,...
- If the answer to your question is a more or le...
- It's very close, much closer than you think, ...
- The idea that continuity of identity is carried...
- This is objective! So it partakes in objectivi...
-
▼
November
(30)
Saturday, 23 November 2019
Consciousness is not in space or time, this is astounding enough, but in addition you cannot say that space and time are in consciousness because then you are picturing consciousness as space-like, going further with a metaphor than the brief insight it might legitimately contain. Space and time are for consciousness, but neither the topology nor the ontology of our ordinary self-centred experience of the world give any clue to what this consciousness, which is all that we can ever be, is 'like' - in fact again, it cannot be like anything, it doesn't belong to experience. It is a further twist on the eye being unable to see itself, the subject not being any sort of object, here that which makes experience possible cannot be brought nearer by way of any understanding or thought process, since these latter can only be analogies of experience. The only experience of the experiencer is the experiencing itself and nothing that is or can be experienced.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.