Blog Archive
-
▼
2018
(365)
-
▼
January
(31)
- People speak of desire as if it were a ta...
- To have a self is to have purposes; the self...
- Complex phenomena which include a form of re...
- The relationship between consciousness and d...
- Every identity is unconscious; identities ar...
- Flights of fancy might make it seem complex,...
- It depends on what it you are trying to expl...
- Not just in thought but in comportment as ...
- A = X'? There are two ways of thinking about...
- Begin with the reduction of A to A'. [Perha...
- The reduct A' of an experience A might be re...
- Biography, or your sad history, sets tight b...
- You might say it was a series of stuffy lit...
- Paradise worlds, worlds of desire. But th...
- Has anyone ever succeeded in getting it dow...
- There is a bitter sweet alienation in the re...
- Whatever it is that is real, you are that, n...
- That which is written falls curling like a r...
- As your experience this is accompanied with ...
- In desiring something, some X, it is not tha...
- There are elements in you that want to spea...
- In waking life you are the character, but i...
- But who's experience? To speak of experie...
- Weather conditions not conducive to the spr...
- A double movement: on one side artificial i...
- Sometimes you almost get the joke. It's all...
- How can you distinguish an original though...
- The mind is metaphors and metaphors are seek...
- It ought to be seen as odd that when philoso...
- If there is some interior act that brings ...
- The purest lyricism does not partake of the ...
-
▼
January
(31)
Thursday, 4 January 2018
The mind is metaphors and metaphors are seeking, and to say this is casting further metaphors, going out, going in, the same and different. It is, I am, are metaphors, maybe the last ones, or the first ones, but either way they cast a space out before, a light and a dark, a before and a to come; and what makes metaphor is not metaphor and not not metaphor either. Negation too, and negation of negation, neither is nor is not. Ripples and reflections are not ripples and reflections and hence are ripples and reflections, in?... in.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.