t

If there is no interpretation of interpretation then time is simple interpretation, fulfilling its role as the inexorable registration of experience, for experience, in experience. It coordinates potentialities, distinguishing a first from a second and a third and an n-th visitation in events. Every experience can be returned to, but the one who returns takes its pass from the registry and if it has a motive, if it is drawn from its circumstance, if it re-quests the pass, then what it re-ceives is stamped with the coordinates of the intention, is coordinated with secondary or ternary or n-ary instance, with the entropic flow of its effective difference in the spreading panoply of interpretation. Because there is a key to every first instance but it is not given to volition to grasp it. This is a way of showing how natural it is that there should be experience of eternal presence, of Proustian memory, of time present in time past, and that it should be delivered with perfect elusiveness, perfect inexperience.