Blog Archive
-
▼
2017
(348)
-
▼
July
(31)
- These enquiries are just expanded figures or...
- Emotions can be detached from the will, from...
- It is not so much that consciousness has dif...
- Meaning is when one structure represents ano...
- It's not about an "I" thought, as if it were...
- One version of who I am (what this is) is co...
- To say that consciousness does not exist i...
- Somehow, once things start to become a littl...
- You are scattered in time, there are parts o...
- The third-person world is essentially the wo...
- Purposive frames compete for priority of con...
- The "I" is the protagonist of purposeful act...
- There is something comical yet also quite sa...
- The notions of truth and of freedom may not ...
- The first-, second- and third-person perspe...
- Locating the essence of consciousness in the...
- No narration or representation can ever capt...
- It is strange that inner identity poses a pr...
- A past event retained in long-term memory ne...
- Say that an atom of experience contains, or ...
- Moods and states seem all too easy to expl...
- The consciousness in dreamless sleep is not ...
- It is exactly the same consciousness in...
- As to the question of whether an AI can have...
- To seek a revelation of your core self by fo...
- Primary narcissism is another name for that ...
- Desire is far more mysterious than first app...
- You should be able to say "I am", but not "I...
- The missing word was incarnation, this is no...
- If you regard identification as the pivot by...
-
▼
July
(31)
Monday, 3 July 2017
You should be able to say "I am", but not "I exist", the two being quite different in that the former only points towards 'inner' and ever present certainty, while the latter asserts objective reality. The inner certainty is not to be found, since it can never be lost; anything that can be lost is not it. Hence you should be more friendly towards teachings which deny any special status to the subject, which hold out no position for the observer who is outside of the system; it is not that you would deny the subject, but that any notion of the subject is already within that system, within some version of the objective totality, the 'mnemonic mass' of ordinary reality. There appears to be a series of realisations, small nudges which move you a step. The journey proceeds by these increments, but there is no map and you don't create such a map or path by following it. It is only when it is impossible to say how you got here, that you find you have arrived.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.