It's all happening in the brain, in a system fully and unceasingly engaged with itself and with its exterior environment. The system is full of models, maps and updating processes. There are two main categories of these: the sensory field and the action context, which could be called Representation and Will, each consisting of diverse parts connected by peculiar kinds of linkages, glueings, functors. It is not that different maps and models overlap each other and hence are woven together into a single fabric, each realm is built differently, evolved differently, is based on different invariants, different parameters; different parts of the mind speak different dialects, what connects them is paradoxical, is both and neither at the same time. The linkage is itself a different kind of map or model and the seams joining it to what it links, and to other linkings are not natural, they do not arise as the extension of any one part but are artificial, ingeniously and endogenously created. See this as taking place in the integration of the diverse sense worlds to form the sensory field, and in the integration of the action contexts: research, planning, execution, feedback, and most of all in the integration of sensory with action, so that actually neither one is entirely itself without major input from the other. You don't perceive without acting, you don't act without perceiving. It is these complex domain translators and integrators that require, and so define, your self as one of the invariants - the highest-order invariant, the limit invariant - so that all the parts can function together, not in perfect harmony, but brilliantly, symphonically. At some point in the development of all this the lights come on; it's brilliant and so it is 'seen'. It attracts the attention of pure inwardness. And so what is first illuminated is the system of the self, the most brilliant creative leap, the 'I', and so inwardness is identified with the self. That is the starting point. It's an error, but it's a great place to start. Worth spending an aeon celebrating.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2017
(348)
-
▼
July
(31)
- These enquiries are just expanded figures or...
- Emotions can be detached from the will, from...
- It is not so much that consciousness has dif...
- Meaning is when one structure represents ano...
- It's not about an "I" thought, as if it were...
- One version of who I am (what this is) is co...
- To say that consciousness does not exist i...
- Somehow, once things start to become a littl...
- You are scattered in time, there are parts o...
- The third-person world is essentially the wo...
- Purposive frames compete for priority of con...
- The "I" is the protagonist of purposeful act...
- There is something comical yet also quite sa...
- The notions of truth and of freedom may not ...
- The first-, second- and third-person perspe...
- Locating the essence of consciousness in the...
- No narration or representation can ever capt...
- It is strange that inner identity poses a pr...
- A past event retained in long-term memory ne...
- Say that an atom of experience contains, or ...
- Moods and states seem all too easy to expl...
- The consciousness in dreamless sleep is not ...
- It is exactly the same consciousness in...
- As to the question of whether an AI can have...
- To seek a revelation of your core self by fo...
- Primary narcissism is another name for that ...
- Desire is far more mysterious than first app...
- You should be able to say "I am", but not "I...
- The missing word was incarnation, this is no...
- If you regard identification as the pivot by...
-
▼
July
(31)
Wednesday, 26 July 2017
It's all happening in the brain, in a system fully and unceasingly engaged with itself and with its exterior environment. The system is full of models, maps and updating processes. There are two main categories of these: the sensory field and the action context, which could be called Representation and Will, each consisting of diverse parts connected by peculiar kinds of linkages, glueings, functors. It is not that different maps and models overlap each other and hence are woven together into a single fabric, each realm is built differently, evolved differently, is based on different invariants, different parameters; different parts of the mind speak different dialects, what connects them is paradoxical, is both and neither at the same time. The linkage is itself a different kind of map or model and the seams joining it to what it links, and to other linkings are not natural, they do not arise as the extension of any one part but are artificial, ingeniously and endogenously created. See this as taking place in the integration of the diverse sense worlds to form the sensory field, and in the integration of the action contexts: research, planning, execution, feedback, and most of all in the integration of sensory with action, so that actually neither one is entirely itself without major input from the other. You don't perceive without acting, you don't act without perceiving. It is these complex domain translators and integrators that require, and so define, your self as one of the invariants - the highest-order invariant, the limit invariant - so that all the parts can function together, not in perfect harmony, but brilliantly, symphonically. At some point in the development of all this the lights come on; it's brilliant and so it is 'seen'. It attracts the attention of pure inwardness. And so what is first illuminated is the system of the self, the most brilliant creative leap, the 'I', and so inwardness is identified with the self. That is the starting point. It's an error, but it's a great place to start. Worth spending an aeon celebrating.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.