Blog Archive
-
▼
2016
(343)
-
▼
January
(31)
- He played with the possibilities that remain...
- The imagining of a transformation in the exp...
- He would say: As obvious as is the I, it is ...
- He wondered what he was thinking about when ...
- It seemed to him that consciousness buttin...
- In trying to understand consciousness he con...
- The relationship of two objects that have be...
- We think of the visual presentation of objec...
- It was not rare to experience a moment of se...
- He would either wrestle with the other, in r...
- He was fascinated by the transformation in p...
- Sights and sounds dominated his notion of se...
- Nothing can render the formless dynami...
- Catching himself in the act of seeking reass...
- Try to start out from the simple given of yo...
- A cold-spell in September seemed to him a fi...
- He would often find himself at the collapsin...
- It was perhaps only a grammatical accident t...
- His explorations in search of orientati...
- He'd come close enough, on a few occasions, ...
- He had the idea that honesty was an objectiv...
- He found himself in a world where resemblanc...
- In his world there were no longer any master...
- In a world delineated and ramified by purpos...
- A large proportion of his mental activity wa...
- Say the world is a purely virtual actual...
- In the permutations around getting it right ...
- There was a tendency in the culture, to whic...
- One of the prejudices of the present is that...
- He had nothing and so made a random start in...
- Awakening is not the end result of any pathw...
-
▼
January
(31)
Tuesday, 5 January 2016
In the permutations around getting it right formations recur and drift endlessly. The same is discovered in the different, and the different in the seemingly same. The long history of slow changes reveals the framing of the questions responding to ever-new relationships of subjecthood and social knowledge. But the progress is illusory, the circus does what it only can, goes round and round; we won't be there to see it right. The question will never end with a display of general facts to an audience of such as ourselves. The drive towards such an us is the desire for a certain metaphysics, that there should be certain kinds of matters and that their way of being real should stand. This world where truth is in the collective self, the we, is not the same as the thinker's world of the generalised I. This latter is singular but is such as can be instantiated by any self. It is the one world in which each self finds itself alone and with others who remain other. It is its own answer to the question of reality, the basis for confirming any such being as might appear. If it is indeed the I which actualises this world out of all possible worlds then it is clear that it must be the same I for everyone, the choice function that crystallises the entire system of worlds and which therefore must be both within and without them.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.