Blog Archive
-
▼
2015
(207)
-
▼
October
(31)
- The universe of his adventures was divided i...
- The light fiery texture, the intimate knowle...
- Cosmological theory has made tremendous prog...
- Self-awareness which ought perhaps to seen ...
- Objectivity seems to reach some sort of limi...
- Consciousness and intelligence are in...
- In the cascade of impressions and intentions...
- At times he had insisted on there being di...
- There is a dimension of consciousness that k...
- When is the actor known but in reflection on...
- Free will is simply the premise implied by t...
- In the old idealism it was enough to say tha...
- The self of the middle realm, the reflective...
- Anything we recognise as an idea already pre...
- Life moves with its own motion and we find o...
- There is the understander and his works, an ...
- He would take up the suggestions of a moment...
- Some among the many latent connections of id...
- Just to describe the way it is is the hardes...
- All knowing is knowing by identity, but know...
- In relation to what appear as physical objec...
- The thing as process, the mattering, or what...
- Does this moment have assumptions? Of course...
- In the theory of finance, and perhaps its pr...
- Every perceived object can be reframed as a ...
- To know someone, to think you know someone, ...
- Becoming aware of repetition he would be str...
- The primary person and the secondary person ...
- He often felt as if he were growing out of a...
- Certain public spaces act like chromatograph...
- Any experience of getting inside a matter as...
-
▼
October
(31)
Tuesday, 6 October 2015
To know someone, to think you know someone, is always an indefinite regression into the past. When this is particularly acute we hear it said, "It was as if I'd always known her." But the past referred to here is not exactly the historical past, it is a kind of essential past. If you remember by saying, "Oh, I know you, we did such and such together", and then wonder, "but how did we recognise each other before that?", you'd have to answer something like, "we were members of each other in the pleroma". How can this have any reality? The evidence against it seems not hard to find, but does hatred, indifference, alienation, or mere haphazard constitute such evidence? If you projected that fulness into division, into space and time, isn't this world exactly what you'd expect? To look into an other's face is to touch on something outside of time, a prior one-ness, located in a direction perpendicular to the four of space and time. Our dealings with each other are so fascinating because they play against this more or less distant background.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.