All knowing is knowing by identity, but knowing is forever coming upon the new. Latencies are exposed and we recognise them, immediately or after a little time. The total of what may be latent, the inner intelligence of experience, cannot be guessed. In science we see that current questions and ways of seeing things could not have been conceived in the past, when certain evidence and presuppositions were absent, but once these are given and the context is formed then the questions and ways of seeing become obvious, maybe even too much so. The same should apply to the inquiry which attempts to uncover the subjective pole, or indeed the subject itself. The machinery of thought is not well conformed to this task, and may in fact hinder it because of its categorical structure and logic, but this is no argument against the endeavour. One cannot know what form it might take, it is an exercise in abandonment of preconceptions, a radical abandonmnet, even an abandonment of abandonment, but in the light, to the light, as the light.