The problem perceived as the 'binding' of distinct moments of consciousness refers to the same question as Kant identified with his 'transcendental unity of apperception', the former seeming viewed from the outside and the latter from the inside. In either case the question remains unresolved, because not fully stated, in either terms. This is because in the mere statement of the question a view is already presumed in which these 'moments' belong together. There is no flux of proto-conscious events, nor is there a world in which these atomic qualities first arise. It is all or nothing, or better, it is all and nothing.