Blog Archive
-
▼
2022
(365)
-
▼
October
(31)
- A private language does different things than a p...
- Experience of self occurs in a private language a...
- Experience as that which seeks to be expressed an...
- If there is a capacity for experience to connect ...
- The imperative to understand everything, meaning ...
- The interplay of the operators 'for all' and 'the...
- The experiencing that is you is in relation to al...
- The self in the street, you might think of it as ...
- The material reality with its endless unfolding d...
- The cogito is less about thinking reaching into b...
- The appearing and experiencing world with its iro...
- Is it no more than a thought experiment to concei...
- When you think of reality, of all that matters, y...
- The great historical cycle is driven by the striv...
- It's not a background consciousness but a backgro...
- The distinction between whatness and thatness con...
- Is the background of being, the underlying of the...
- The idealist notion of the absolute subject behin...
- Interweaving and overlapping of kinds of activity...
- Subject and object can be regarded as independent...
- Instead of subject and object, think of seller an...
- There is no experiencer but there are experiencin...
- The character or egoity is what brings experience...
- You experiencing as human experiencing is grounde...
- All of those human aspirations for eminence or do...
- Aspiring to being is having a face, or perhaps be...
- In the world of appearances the stakes always see...
- The cascade of inner objects, immediately identif...
- Facticity is in the gap between what what life ha...
- Every framing in terms of consciousness or experi...
- To be quiet enough to sense the dominant mood, th...
-
▼
October
(31)
Monday, 17 October 2022
It's not a background consciousness but a background to consciousness, to experiencing in its widest sense, to being and so it is not itself conscious or experienced or something that is. --So, it's nothing at all, you are just imagining it, you come out of nothing and go back into nothing! --Indeed, but you speak as if you know what this nothing is whereas you can only refer to it in relation to things, as the absence of things, as if it were easily understood, but in this way you cannot reach the nothing of which I speak.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.