The question of Being might be imaginary, as of a simulation persistently troubled to know how it stands to what, presumably, it is a simulation of. That speculation is perhaps incoherent, but it must be allowed as a sign of the times, an index of collective madness. That aside, the question of Being is not one which can be taken up or put aside contingently, as a curious option to be explored, it is not a subject matter. What must be the case is that everything that takes the stage of experience is a response to it without being explicitly so. Since Being is regarded as the purest form of generality this might appear little different from the most neutral kind of happening. Observe rather, that when anything is, it is as something resolved, like the solution to an equation, in an ever so subtle way it is a relief to have it there. Not being Nothing is the vocation of distinct and thing-like arising.