Will is inherently dualist or better pluralist. You will against something and for something else. At the same time it is without a subject, since the order in which a the subject emerges is a representational order, both imaginary and symbolic. Idealism of any kind must be premised on the position: let there be a subject, then... . Furthermore you can't say that one arises out of the other, the discontinuity between them cannot be bridged from either side. This poses experience as a question or a telos. It tends inexorably towards some omega and everything is to be drawn up into that destiny.