Wrangling about free-will versus determinism is a futile exercise. There is no one for whom either of these could be the case. If you can be persuaded of the necessary truth of determinism you are only being enmeshed deeper into the illusion that there is a subject who could benefit from this knowledge, adding further abstraction to abstraction, quite apart from the performative contradiction implicit in treating the entire issue seriously. There is no position to be taken on this because there is no place for the distinction to exist at all. If you must do something then you might consider why this question cannot be a question.