That there is an experiencer somehow ontologically distinguished from experiencing remains a persistent illusion, even after you have pulled it apart. It is as if there is a certain culpability involved as, apart from the purely cognitive issues, it recalls the dark core of your personal psychology. There is a paradox here because the only way that this core can be owned is via the very illusion that it supposedly prevents from dissolving. However, if the effect of that core, the back-projection of a self locked in a temporal and social predicament, were to be disengaged, or put 'off-line', the core would remain as a perturbation of the field alongside all of the other perturbations that give rise to no particular problems. What must then happen is that the residual psychological structure is completely impersonalised; it is something belonging to the collectively human subfield of ongoing experiencing. This only comes into sight when viewed from awareness coextensive with the entire field and hence free of space and time and reification. If there is a secret door to the great doubt it is only in where you are least inclined to look for it.