Blog Archive
-
▼
2019
(354)
-
▼
November
(30)
- Thought is to be understood more generally th...
- There is a Darwinian version of critical real...
- The more perfectly that art is able to render...
- Propositional attitudes or purposive actions ...
- If you were to describe your experience in co...
- If experience has certain features or content...
- Mind is imagined to be a complex mental organis...
- Consciousness is not in space or time, this is ...
- The other is alter-ego is the most radical an...
- Sometimes the city just beats you down and yo...
- If in writing some sort of structure of refer...
- Slow experiencing without reflection. At first...
- If the idea was to report in the lightest and...
- There is a fundamental anxiety against which a...
- 'Many are called, but few are chosen' - is th...
- But to realise existentially what you know ca...
- If you do a quick sweep of how you are spatial...
- Realism in no way resembles the colourless fa...
- The inherent uncertainty of experience is not t...
- Say that minds were nodal points in one overa...
- Kant's phrase "transscendentale Einheit der App...
- Wittgenstein's no private language argument an...
- You conduct an enquiry in thought. This means ...
- Step into a large and empty and very dimly-li...
- The three gunas form a sort of treadmill. The...
- What you are is being engaged in a situation,...
- If the answer to your question is a more or le...
- It's very close, much closer than you think, ...
- The idea that continuity of identity is carried...
- This is objective! So it partakes in objectivi...
-
▼
November
(30)
Wednesday, 6 November 2019
The three gunas form a sort of treadmill. The sattva has a short half-life it decays into equal measures of the other two. Rajas burns up in fits of passion yielding tamasic ashes which accumulate together with the other products of decay and would drown you if they didn't prompt a sort of reflex ginnying up of desire, the soul's drug of preference, rajasic intoxication, a fraction of which allows itself to be transformed into sattva and the rest into colourful chaos. How well you know that moment of flicking the nothing of passivity into the something of intent want. (You can see this in others more clearly than in yourself.) And so it goes around and around. So, what you believe in is stimulus, is the state of being stimulated, regardless of its apparent goal. This is basically a love of pleasure, with more or less of a pretension to refinement. And isn't your patchy intellectuality, your love, your humour, your aesthetics, just this kind of gourmandising?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.