Blog Archive
-
▼
2019
(354)
-
▼
May
(31)
- The temporal self's drive towards achieving bei...
- Consciousness is immediacy, but the immediate i...
- A level of experience is a connected realm of t...
- One version of idealism is the inverse of pan...
- The perhaps excessive emphasis on consciousne...
- The strangest thing about experience is that ...
- All experience is particular and even if it m...
- Why is there no boundary to consciousness, no...
- It's one thing to realise the inherent beauty o...
- Actions, even the simplest of them, turning a ...
- Your being conscious relies on the body which a...
- This may not be the only world you inhabit. Wha...
- You can never prepare for it, it's much too q...
- A problem of idealism is the way that the cle...
- Idealism is the taking the step of letting go ...
- The protagonist of the unfolding life is cont...
- Desire and purposive action and their variant...
- It is just because experience is flat that it u...
- It's very funny really. You are a process full ...
- Thinking, feeling and willing, or logos, pathos...
- Nothing is like anything else, nothing refers...
- Experience being always individual experience...
- The story of a soul, the successive stages of...
- Whatever object your attention falls upon is ...
- The reality of the world in which you find yo...
- Step back, without disengaging anything and in ...
- The difference between attending a live music...
- No experiencing is more or less the totality ...
- Admit that there are levels of being which impl...
- You go round and round like a rat in a maze, t...
- Being able to eminently receive what you know ...
-
▼
May
(31)
Thursday, 23 May 2019
It's one thing to realise the inherent beauty of everything in the perceptual field, all it requires perhaps is just a small sideways shift in attention, why then should it seem to be so much more complex a task to reposition everything within the field of thought and self-reflection, or all the embedded reflexes of purpose? The world is shared and beauty, even unexpressed falls under love, as a sort of gift or potential gift. But you do not love yourself, is that it? Or is that inner love is conceived at cross-purposes, misdirected both in intensity and aim? But why not even that as no more than pure phenomenon, you alone with your maker. Can't you just share a quiet joke at the expense of every cherished image and its reverse?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.