Views of experience which take the naturalistic or scientific worldview as their starting point or reference point and then work their way by audacious leaps to how it is from the inside seem to misguided forms of idolatry. Whatever is explained in this way remains opaque, even if there is predictive power in it. In the order of certainty the subject must come first, you must release the anchors that bind you to the objective and turn the world inside out. It is deeply implausible until you do it, and then it is clear that nothing as far as the experienced world has changed, only become more brilliant. The theorising breaks off at its obvious limit, finds its place together with all other objectivities. The limit of what you are is the limit of what you can remember - who knows how far this goes? Who.