If your waking self and your dream self were to meet in a bar what would they talk about? Surely the waking self would be fascinated with the dream self's ramblings, with its slippery and pregnant allusions, with its eccentric charisma, its impervious self-obsession. But the dream self could never engage directly with the waking self's preoccupations, it would behave like a hebephrenic psychoanalyst, undermining and overturning every question, every opening of its partner, displacing the seriousness of connected thought with obscure and below the belt personal references, with puns and with massive irrelevancies seemingly designed to tangle up every thread by dazzling misdirections. The conversation would resemble the text of a post-modern novel. Would the waking self find this valuable, would it begin to doubt itself, or would it grow tired and seek to escape so that it could regain the cool transparency of its own thoughts and the subtle elusiveness of its best intuitions? Would it recognise something vital to its quest, to the attainment of its deepest desires, in the disordered utterances of its dream sibling? Is this something like the relationship of philosophy and poetry?
Blog Archive
-
▼
2018
(365)
-
▼
April
(30)
- Waking along a paved ribbon in a park, you a...
- In the thick of a mood the sense of self bec...
- Without a guiding idea there seems to be onl...
- Some of your basic assumptions may be true a...
- A photograph is legible because you are outs...
- Even if there was some insoluble kernel in t...
- Experience without an experiencer, or the e...
- How dull, flat and stale life can seem. The ...
- In spite of what you take it to be, and you ...
- What appears is what changes; appearance is ...
- It seems natural to think of experience as h...
- If all experience is experience-of then the ...
- Experience has the sense - both as meaning ...
- The idealism of esse est percipi, to be is t...
- The zero-one see-saw. It is as if you embody...
- The writer gives shape to an inchoate prob...
- To turn and see experience as act from the i...
- The shape of things seems to be something ...
- As it goes on here in this moment is there a...
- If you watch a film or read a novel then it ...
- Once admitted that things are not what they ...
- Idealism is perhaps a matter of adding somet...
- Prismatic subjectivity is when there is a gu...
- What and that are two incompatible direction...
- Creaturely knowingness you are. You are what...
- Saying that structures are structured is jus...
- Experience is structured, that what makes it...
- The kind of being that things possess, pheno...
- If your waking self and your dream self...
- It is without qualification, without being,...
-
▼
April
(30)
Monday, 2 April 2018
If your waking self and your dream self were to meet in a bar what would they talk about? Surely the waking self would be fascinated with the dream self's ramblings, with its slippery and pregnant allusions, with its eccentric charisma, its impervious self-obsession. But the dream self could never engage directly with the waking self's preoccupations, it would behave like a hebephrenic psychoanalyst, undermining and overturning every question, every opening of its partner, displacing the seriousness of connected thought with obscure and below the belt personal references, with puns and with massive irrelevancies seemingly designed to tangle up every thread by dazzling misdirections. The conversation would resemble the text of a post-modern novel. Would the waking self find this valuable, would it begin to doubt itself, or would it grow tired and seek to escape so that it could regain the cool transparency of its own thoughts and the subtle elusiveness of its best intuitions? Would it recognise something vital to its quest, to the attainment of its deepest desires, in the disordered utterances of its dream sibling? Is this something like the relationship of philosophy and poetry?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.