Substance and subject are two polar terms that arise in the process of life making sense of itself. These are components which need to be presupposed in order for meaningful action to go forward. They could also be referred to as the properties (in the theatrical sense) and the protagonist, in order to emphasise how distinct their natures seem to be. And yet, while it is easy to distinguish them broadly in practise it is virtually impossible to do so in detail and up close. In experience they are merely two species of objectivity, with subject only somewhat mediated, as the necessarily implied entity that experiences, and perhaps best thought of as something to do with the brain. And so, if all there is are objectivities, subject can only be regarded as a necessary enabling effect, a sort of catalyst to the play of things in motion. An essential confusion remains as to whether subject is prior or posterior in experience and this leaves the way open to a reversal of the terms, so that it could be substance which owns the defining dynamic in experience and subject merely the name for the site or presence where this all takes place.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2015
(207)
-
▼
November
(30)
- To be present is to be here on this occasion...
- The start of a new project was its own Sprin...
- His photographs seemed to express a broader ...
- He was a metastable structure of values and ...
- Substance and subject are two polar terms ...
- Is the belief accorded to ideas, the 'cre' t...
- The distinction in experience between world ...
- A patchwork of times, overlapping habitation...
- He could not shake the imagination of a stat...
- Sometimes his dreams seemed like attempts to...
- The state of the body is the state of body i...
- We are aware of awareness as a bodily state,...
- His world was almost a world of purposeful a...
- He could distinguish internal objects from e...
- Experience is an act or performance in which...
- His inner discourse seemed to require contin...
- He had a sense of choosing in which the choi...
- The two monisms are idealism and materialism...
- Believing itself to be in the world and...
- Suffering and art pose two challenges for id...
- The basic shape of experience does not chang...
- The scene of perfect transmission was a pers...
- In a random spread of things we see a face t...
- To him every random arrangement of things ha...
- The pleasure he took in demonstrations of ra...
- Ah, if only he could write things that conve...
- Whenever a new train of thought ignited in h...
- It may be said that otherness defends itself...
- If there is a world then there is distinctio...
- Nothing could be more remote from the moment...
-
▼
November
(30)
Thursday, 26 November 2015
Substance and subject are two polar terms that arise in the process of life making sense of itself. These are components which need to be presupposed in order for meaningful action to go forward. They could also be referred to as the properties (in the theatrical sense) and the protagonist, in order to emphasise how distinct their natures seem to be. And yet, while it is easy to distinguish them broadly in practise it is virtually impossible to do so in detail and up close. In experience they are merely two species of objectivity, with subject only somewhat mediated, as the necessarily implied entity that experiences, and perhaps best thought of as something to do with the brain. And so, if all there is are objectivities, subject can only be regarded as a necessary enabling effect, a sort of catalyst to the play of things in motion. An essential confusion remains as to whether subject is prior or posterior in experience and this leaves the way open to a reversal of the terms, so that it could be substance which owns the defining dynamic in experience and subject merely the name for the site or presence where this all takes place.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.